HOAs usually have some discretion over how they apply payments to outstanding amounts owed—subject to the general duties to act in good faith and avoid any arbitrary or capricious conduct. Homeowners can request that payments be applied in a particular order, and an association may be willing to comply, but it does not necessarily have to.  

In specific limited scenarios, a homeowner could potentially argue that a payment application by an HOA in a manner contrary to the homeowner’s instructions amounts to misappropriation or unlawful conversion of funds—or a breach of the HOA board’s fiduciary duty.  

However, as long as the money is applied to a debt that is lawfully due and owing to the HOA from the homeowner and the payment application does not violate state law or significantly prejudice the homeowner, the argument is by no means certain of success.

Historically, partial payments have typically been applied to outstanding fees and costs first, next to interest owed, and then to principal. In a minority of states, HOA statutes mandate that associations apply partial payments according to a different order of priority.  

California, for example, requires HOAs to apportion partial payments to outstanding assessments first; then, once assessments are paid, funds can be put toward interest, late charges, and collection costs.  Cal. Civ. Code §5655(a). The order of priority under Texas’s law is delinquent assessments, current assessments, and attorney’s fees, fines, and “any other amount owed to the association.” Tex. Prop. Code §209.0063(a)



Discover More